
Service charges for council tenants has been an issue that I have been trying to gain some clarity on for some time. Reading the last Audit Commissions report it recommends Service Charges for Tenants. It also mentioned that H&F council had been in discussion on this matter. See the previous blog entry for the report.
I submitted this question to the last council meeting -
"Question to: The Leader of the Council.
Further to my question of 27 February 2008-
QUESTION
“Does the current administration propose, during the course of its current term in office to make an additional charge to council tenants, in addition to rent, for the provision of Estate Maintenance and up keep? If so, when?”
RESPONSE:
There have been no proposals put to my Administration either by Hammersmith &
Fulham Homes or by Council Officers recommending separate service charging for
services provided to Council tenants although of course council leaseholders are already separately service charged for a range of housing and estate management services.
Current issue arising.
I note that the Audit Commission’s report of June 2007 for Hammersmith & Fulham ALMO states -
“
108 Service charges have not been introduced for tenants. Charges for communally provided services such as grounds maintenance have not been de-pooled and applied as a separate service charge. HFH and the Council have agreed a way forward for the introduction of service charges but will only do this when efficiencies are achieved in key service areas. “
So my questions are –
Why was I misled with the previous response? Given that the report is the subject of consultation with the council over a period of time.
Within what time frame do the council propose to introduce this charge?
Will rent lower as a result of the service charge being “split out” or “de-pooled”?
What is the “way forward agreed by HFH Homes & the council for the introduction of this charge”, that is what is the plan?"
The response is above.
You can make you own mind up about when service charges will be forthcomming.
No comments:
Post a Comment